I like your approach! Concise, to the point and with total disdain for the opponent, pulling their hidden messages out of the shadow of their double-speak.
this is sharp. is it too sharp for our already threadbare social fabric? in my limited experience, calling people out for hypocrisy is best at shutting them shut up, forcing a retreat to their echo chamber for the validation and post-justification of their intolerance. it rarely rattles any deep seated beliefs or ignorance… unless the criticism is coming from a trusted person, it might as well be praise, since the ignorant person will use a hostile reaction to validate their position: „i hate this person because of their abstract beliefs and they just made me look bad, that’s a concrete reason to hate them and everything they stand for…“
i like the strategy’s candidness, but how does it look in the trenches? it’s a innovative starting point, but could use some fine tuning, lest we further entrench social division… or am i missing something?
I like your approach! Concise, to the point and with total disdain for the opponent, pulling their hidden messages out of the shadow of their double-speak.
That is really kind of you
this is sharp. is it too sharp for our already threadbare social fabric? in my limited experience, calling people out for hypocrisy is best at shutting them shut up, forcing a retreat to their echo chamber for the validation and post-justification of their intolerance. it rarely rattles any deep seated beliefs or ignorance… unless the criticism is coming from a trusted person, it might as well be praise, since the ignorant person will use a hostile reaction to validate their position: „i hate this person because of their abstract beliefs and they just made me look bad, that’s a concrete reason to hate them and everything they stand for…“
i like the strategy’s candidness, but how does it look in the trenches? it’s a innovative starting point, but could use some fine tuning, lest we further entrench social division… or am i missing something?